Approaches The difference between success and failure Published on 03 January 2011 - Revised on The worst projects plan to be late and then slip 25% more. This is according to research conducted by IPA. IPA has carried out a major study of industrial projects, looking at the difference between success and failure. They looked at 73 projects – half good, and half bad. The research team was involved face-to-face at the beginning of the project during the initiation phase, and then went back and collected more data once the project was closed. IPA defined the best projects as those that: Delivered 10% cheaper than the industry average Had an execution duration/cycle time similar to the industry average or faster Were safe and had no fatalities Had no operational performance problems during start-up or in the first 12 months. They defined the worst projects as those that: Were 20% (or over) more expensive than the industry average Had an execution duration/cycle time 20% slower than the industry average. On average, the best projects were 18% cheaper and 8% faster than the industry average. So, what makes a ‘best’ project? The best projects had: Better planning Integrated team Lower turnover of team members Been under control. Managing change was a defining part of keeping a good project under control. Just under 70% of the worst-performing projects had major design changes during engineering. Less than 20% of good projects had major changes. The research team concluded that the majority of schedule slippage was concerned with major changes. You might not expect it, but the worst projects took the longest to do project definition. It’s not the time spent on defining the project that automatically guarantees success – it’s the quality of the planning done during this phase. Lessons Here are the lessons from the research: Fundamentals are important: the level of project planning is strongly correlated with project results. An integrated and well-developed team is key to a successful outcome. Poor execution practice will undo the benefits of good planning: changes made during execution erode the benefits of a good plan. You will not have a ‘best’ project if you set conservative targets. The best projects have a good plan, and competitive targets, which provide competitive results. However, aggressive targets and poor planning are synonymous with failure. Rate this article: No rating Print ElizabethHarrin Elizabeth Harrin, FAPM, is an author and mentor who helps project managers and their teams get more done with less stress. She does that through straight-talking, real-world advice, based on her 20 years in project management roles. She also writes the award-winning blog, A Girl’s Guide to Project Management. Full biography Full biography Elizabeth Harrin, FAPM, is an author and mentor who helps project managers and their teams get more done with less stress. She does that through straight-talking, real-world advice, based on her 20 years in project management roles. Elizabeth has written 5 books about project management: Shortcuts to Success: Project Management in the Real World (which was a finalist in the Management Book of the Year Awards 2014 and now in its second edition), Collaboration Tools for Project Managers, Communicating Change, Project Manager, and Customer-Centric Project Management. She also writes the award-winning blog, A Girl’s Guide to Project Management. You can find Elizabeth online at GirlsGuideToPM.com or on Twitter @girlsguidetopm. Elizabeth holds degrees from the University of York and Roehampton University. She supports project managers through her mentoring programme, Project Management Rebels, and also contributes to a variety of other initiatives including sitting on the advisory board for the RISE Being Lean and Seen programme at Liverpool John Moores University. Elizabeth has led a variety of IT, process improvement and business change projects including an ERP deployment and compliance initiatives. She spent eight years working in financial services (including two based in Paris, France) and 12 years in healthcare. Elizabeth lives with her family in the UK. x Contact author Google Plus Facebook page Twitter Linked In
Quigley & Lauck's Expert Column The Construction Contract Creating a construction contract requires careful consideration to ensure all aspects of the project are clearly defined and agreed upon by all parties. One place to start is using an industry-standard form. By Jon M. Quigley & Steve Lauck25 Apr 2024 min read
Quigley & Lauck's Expert Column Gantt Chart vs. Pert Chart Gantt and PERT charts are project management tools to plan, schedule, and track project progress. They have distinct features and are used in different scenarios based on the project’s complexity and requirements. By Jon M. Quigley & Steve Lauck18 Apr 2024 min read
Quigley & Lauck's Expert Column Mastering Quality: A Deep Dive into Quality Tools and Total... In the competitive landscape of modern business, quality isn't just a benchmark—it's the foundation of success. As organizations strive to improve processes, reduce defects, and enhance customer satisfaction, a suite of quality... By Jon M. Quigley & Steve Lauck27 Mar 2024 min read