<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criteria for Successful Project Management Offices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pmtips.net/criteria-successful-project-management-offices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pmtips.net/criteria-successful-project-management-offices/</link>
	<description>Guidance for Real Life Projects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monday Morning Links &#8211; 26th October : How to Manage a Camel &#8211; Project Management and Recruitment</title>
		<link>http://pmtips.net/criteria-successful-project-management-offices/comment-page-1/#comment-3858</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Morning Links &#8211; 26th October : How to Manage a Camel &#8211; Project Management and Recruitment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmtips.net/?p=3342#comment-3858</guid>
		<description>[...] Brad Egeland of Project Management Tips (another candidate for a parking space!) again skills us with practical advice on becoming a successful PMO &#8211; http://pmtips.net/criteria-successful-project-management-offices/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brad Egeland of Project Management Tips (another candidate for a parking space!) again skills us with practical advice on becoming a successful PMO &#8211; <a href="http://pmtips.net/criteria-successful-project-management-offices/" rel="nofollow">http://pmtips.net/criteria-successful-project-management-offices/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Primoz Frelih, PMP</title>
		<link>http://pmtips.net/criteria-successful-project-management-offices/comment-page-1/#comment-3833</link>
		<dc:creator>Primoz Frelih, PMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmtips.net/?p=3342#comment-3833</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll waste some paper to print this :) These all are great strating points to be applicable in a custom project management environment. PMO should promote its benefits in order to raise inside the organizational hierarchy.
Good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll waste some paper to print this :) These all are great strating points to be applicable in a custom project management environment. PMO should promote its benefits in order to raise inside the organizational hierarchy.<br />
Good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Clarke</title>
		<link>http://pmtips.net/criteria-successful-project-management-offices/comment-page-1/#comment-3832</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pmtips.net/?p=3342#comment-3832</guid>
		<description>I think one of the key aspects of PMOs is their scope. I have seen many fail, The biggest issue is what are they there to do. Some are directors who control the delivery, some are more about the how things are delivered are rather than what. some are a combination

One of the key aspects in addition to what you have above is a signed up to terms of reference.

The terms of reference needs to be understood by all

7 out of 10 PMO fail because either they do not have TOR which is followed, spread themselves to thin, or loose focus on their key reason for existence in the first place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the key aspects of PMOs is their scope. I have seen many fail, The biggest issue is what are they there to do. Some are directors who control the delivery, some are more about the how things are delivered are rather than what. some are a combination</p>
<p>One of the key aspects in addition to what you have above is a signed up to terms of reference.</p>
<p>The terms of reference needs to be understood by all</p>
<p>7 out of 10 PMO fail because either they do not have TOR which is followed, spread themselves to thin, or loose focus on their key reason for existence in the first place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
